(ofSpirostreptus hamifer Humbert, 1865)Humbert, A. (1865). Essai sur les Myriapodes de Ceylan. Mémoires de la Société de Physiques et d'Histoire naturelle de Genève, 18: 1-63. Genève, Bale page(s): 52 [details]
Attems, C. M. T. Graf von (1936). Diplopoda of India. Memoirs of the Indian Museum, 11(4): 133-323. Calcutta page(s): 286; note: Harpurostreptus attemsi, misidentified and (re-)described as Harpurostreptus (=Spirostreptus) hamifer. See Carl 1941 for more information. [details]
original description(ofSpirostreptus hamifer Humbert, 1865)Humbert, A. (1865). Essai sur les Myriapodes de Ceylan. Mémoires de la Société de Physiques et d'Histoire naturelle de Genève, 18: 1-63. Genève, Bale page(s): 52 [details]
additional sourceBano, K. (1998). Taxonomic review of the family Harpagophoridae (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida), characteristics of the Indian genera and checklist of the Indian species. Proceedings of the Zoological Society (Calcutta), 51(2): 183-187 page(s): 169 [details]
additional sourceJeekel, C. A. W. (2006). A bibliographic catalogue of the Oriental Harpagophoridae (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida). Myriapod memoranda, 9: 5-58 page(s): 31; note: As Harpurostreptus hamifer (valid?). Note: Exact identity of this species, which was based on a female type, not yet determined. [details]
additional sourcede Zoysa, H. K. S.; Nguyen Duc, A.; Wickramasinghe, S. (2016). Annotated checklist of millipedes (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) of Sri Lanka. <em>Zootaxa.</em> 4061 (5): 151-482., available online athttps://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4061.5.1 page(s): 463; note: Remarks. Jeekel (2006) noted that the taxonomic status of this species needs to be confirmed because the
description was only based on the female type. [details]
additional sourceGolovatch, S. I.; Wesener, T. (2016). A species checklist of the millipedes (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) of India. <em>Zootaxa.</em> 4129(1): 1-75., available online athttps://www.biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.4129.1.1/21377 page(s): 26; note: Remark: The identity of this species, which was based on a female type from Sri Lanka, remains obscure (Jeekel
2006) [details]
additional sourceHollier, J.; Schiller, E.; Akkari, N. (2017). An annotated list of the Diplopoda described by Aloïs Humbert alone and with Henri de Saussure, and the Diplopoda from Saussure's Mexico expedition. <em>Revue suisse de Zoologie.</em> 124(2): 203-224., available online athttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.893503 page(s): 211 [details]
status sourceCarl, J. (1941). Diplopoden aus Südindien und Ceylon. 2. Teil: Nematophora und Juliformia. Revue suisse de zoologie, 48(22): 569-714. Genève page(s): 656; note: The type specimen of Spirostreptus hamifer Humbert is a female and not identical with Harpurostreptus hamifer sensu Attems 1936. H. attemsi nomen nov. for Harpurostreptus hamifer Attems 1936, nec S. h...
The type specimen of Spirostreptus hamifer Humbert is a female and not identical with Harpurostreptus hamifer sensu Attems 1936. H. attemsi nomen nov. for Harpurostreptus hamifer Attems 1936, nec S. hamifer Humbert. The type of S. hamifer is a female.
original description (unavailable nomenclaturally)Attems, C. M. T. Graf von (1936). Diplopoda of India. Memoirs of the Indian Museum, 11(4): 133-323. Calcutta page(s): 286; note: Harpurostreptus attemsi, misidentified and (re-)described as Harpurostreptus (=Spirostreptus) hamifer. See Carl 1941 for more information. [details]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality